What the Christian Response to Merry Christmas Starbucks Is Missing

550718873_8ef83562eb

If you have been on social media over the last week or so, you’ve no doubt heard about the Starbucks Red Cup Controversy.[1] In a brilliant piece of faux-outrage social marketing, a would-be Christian Internet Personality put together a video complaining that Starbucks had removed Christmas from their cups and asked people, when ordering their lattes, to say that their name was “Merry Christmas”, so that baristas would be forced to write it on them. This video describing the latest Secular Depravity Ruining Our Country, which conveniently has absolutely no basis in reality, got over half a million likes, the endorsement of a particularly famous toupeed troll-like creature, and was breathlessly picked up as a national “news story” by a lot of journalistic organizations that apparently have nothing better to do with their time.

The Christian internet responded by furiously disowning the controversy, with posts like this or this or this. However, in this rush, there is one question that I have not heard any Christians asking of themselves.

What does it mean that most people think it’s entirely plausible that Christians would be outraged by this?

To be more blunt, isn’t this sort of huffy freak-out perfectly consonant with our pattern of behavior as a people?

Here’s what I mean:

Every year, a large, visible group of Christians violently frets about the “War on Christmas[2]”, which somehow, is not about people going hungry or rampant consumerism, but about whether or not people will say “Merry Christmas” to you.

Anytime a controversy erupts on the internet, Christians are often first in line to virulently attack each other’s personal and spiritual integrity. (Don’t believe me? Talk to any author or speaker who steps outside the theological or political orthodoxy of their particular Christian tribe.)

Anytime someone tells a joke about Christians on Facebook, there are at least three aggrieved comments from people that prove that utterly lack a sense of humor about themselves.

If they visit many of our churches (yes mainliners, I’m looking at you), they will inevitably encounter several people who are determinedly angry at families for doing soccer on Sunday, at projectors over hymnbooks, at pastors who wear jeans, or people in general for not being as good as they are.

If they regularly visit other churches, they may regularly encounter Christians who are so methodically mechanistic in their relationships that you really believe that they’d do or say anything to get you in the doors of a church, even if that means lie, cheat, or demean others.[3]

All our “That’s Not Us!” defenses don’t account for much when for many people, the entire witness of the rest of their lives suggests that Christians are, in fact, people who will get quite angry over something as stupidly trivial as the logo on a Starbucks cup.

What if rather than arguing with other Christians about this controversy, or yelling, “That’s not us! That’s not us!” we were to say something like this:

   “To all the people out there who believe that Christians get outraged over things like coffee cups: We are sorry. We are sorry that we’ve acted in ways that make you think this type of behavior is something we regularly engage in. We will try to do better, so that when the next faux-religious controversy comes around, you’ll be able to honestly say, “that doesn’t sound like any Christians I know.”

 

 


[1] What, you haven’t heard of it? Good for you. However, if you’re feeling a little masochistic, you can find out more about it from the Atlantic, from Eater.com, or Christianity Today.

[2] While quite visibly not freaking about issues like hunger, poverty, or violence, which it seems quite likely Jesus cared a lot more about.

[3] Or give away guns. Seriously, multiple churches have done this.

5 thoughts on “What the Christian Response to Merry Christmas Starbucks Is Missing

  1. Just read this blog from you, could not possibly agree more.

    I fully also believe that when there is a fight to “keep Christ in Christmas” the goal should be to clearly distance the understanding of Christ far from the fantasy of the Christmas miracle In society to the reality that the kindness and generosity of Christmas should be expressed and demonstrated all times. That is the Christ in Christmas.

    1. I agree completely! And that – for me, is what it means for me to really celebrate Christmas in a way that is Christian, not cultural.

  2. Amen! I am so tired of hearing how Christians are being persecuted because someone doesn’t agree with them. I spent a great deal of time in the conservative, homeschool world, and am still ‘recovering’ from that thinking. Love your blog… please keep up the great writing!

    1. Thanks Jen – both for the comment and the appreciation. I think being non-defensive and humble is SUCH an important part of how we relate to the world, especially considering the reputation that Christians have nowadays!

  3. I agree. I would add that another important part is to see everyone…. EVERYONE!! as God sees them… one of His beloved children. I think a lot of Christians forget that part, they think they have it all figured out and no one but them is right. Nope!! The biggest problem with that kind of thinking is that it harms those that are most vulnerable… and people die. It’s just plain wrong. BTW… saw you and Melissa speak a few times at School of Congregational Development and loved what you were doing with the Vine… bummer that that had to end, sounds like you were making a real difference. Can’t wait to see what you all do next!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *